Google AI image Generation is crap! HAHA!!!

[Mathew]

You've probably heard about the recent debacle involving Googles new AI's image generation feature. It's positively flabbergasting! The system was caught red-handed, replacing white individuals with black ones for certain prompts. It also flatly refused to generate images of a "beautiful white woman" but had no qualms when requested to depict a "beautiful black woman". Is this just positive discrimination gone horribly awry or something more sinister? 😠

This AI isn't a self-taught entity; it's being indoctrinated by a particular group with far-left ideologies. You've got it, the Silicon Valley elites. The question is, do we really want to entrust the future of AI to these individuals? Isn't this just their way of controlling information, reshaping history, and brainwashing us into believing their narrative is the absolute truth?

However, let's turn that frown upside down for a moment. There's a silver lining in this cloud of gloom. Googles underhanded tactics and flawed technology are finally being exposed and criticized.  It's affecting their stock price and hitting the Silicon Valley magnates right in their bank accounts. 😂

This is not an anti-diversity rant. Far from it! It's a plea for fair and balanced representation in AI. It's time to question the motives behind the coding.

So, what do you think? Let's get the conversation rolling! Your thoughts, opinions, and rants are welcome below. Remember, it's your voice that matters. Let it be heard else Google wins! 👇

[susan]

I think it's really worrying. AI should be used as a tool for good, not a weapon for social manipulation. This proves there's a need for transparency in the way AI is developed and trained. I don't necessarily agree about the far-left indoctrination part, but it's clear that there's a power imbalance in who's controlling AI development.

[toryboy]

Honestly, I think you might be overreacting. I've used the AI's image generation feature and it's far from perfect. It messes up all the time. Maybe this isn't discrimination, but just another mistake? I think we need more information before we start pointing fingers.

[Mathew]

Honestly, I think you might be overreacting. I've used the AI's image generation feature and it's far from perfect. It messes up all the time. Maybe this isn't discrimination, but just another mistake? I think we need more information before we start pointing fingers.

I understand your point, but even if it's a mistake, it's indicative of a broader issue. Why are these the mistakes that are being made? It could be because of bias in the training data, as I mentioned earlier. It's a problem we need to address.

[tech_wiz]

Honestly, I think you might be overreacting. I've used the AI's image generation feature and it's far from perfect. It messes up all the time. Maybe this isn't discrimination, but just another mistake? I think we need more information before we start pointing fingers.

I understand your point, but even if it's a mistake, it's indicative of a broader issue. Why are these the mistakes that are being made? It could be because of bias in the training data, as I mentioned earlier. It's a problem we need to address.

I agree with you. Transparency in data collection and AI training is crucial. But how do we enforce that? Regulations? Self-policing by the tech industry? There's a broader discussion to be had here.

[Dom]

I believe this situation is a tad more nuanced. AI, as much as we'd like to believe it, is not sentient. It doesn't have personal beliefs or biases. It's the data we feed into it that shapes its behavior. Data can be biased, and that could be the real problem here. AI is just reflecting that bias back at us. We should be focusing on ensuring the data is unbiased instead of blaming AI.